/services
SEO for science, deep tech and B2B companies
Oxford's spin-outs and science park companies sell to people who search in precise technical language. Generic agency SEO misses those searches completely.
Who this service is for
Oxford has an unusually large cluster of science and technology businesses. Many began as University spin-outs. Others grew up on Oxford Science Park, owned by Magdalen College and open since 1991, at Begbroke Science Park, ARC Oxford (formerly Oxford Business Park), Milton Park near Didcot, or Harwell Campus, home to Diamond Light Source and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. We work with:
- Spin-outs and early-stage companies moving from a grant-era project page to a commercial website. See our post on spin-out websites.
- Contract research organisations and testing labs competing nationally and internationally.
- Instrument, reagent and equipment makers with technical catalogues.
- Software and data companies selling to research, health and engineering buyers.
- Engineering consultancies and specialist manufacturers in Cowley, Abingdon, Bicester and Witney.
- Space, energy and quantum firms on and around Harwell Campus.
How B2B and science search differs
| Consumer search | B2B and science search |
|---|---|
| High volume, short phrases | Low volume, precise and technical phrases |
| One person decides | Several people research: scientists, managers, procurement |
| Buying in minutes or days | Buying over months, with trials and approvals |
| Reviews and price drive choice | Evidence, specifications, compliance and credibility drive choice |
| Local intent common | Usually national or international |
That changes what good SEO looks like. Ranking for a broad term matters less than being the best page for the exact method, application or problem a buyer has.
What is included, step by step
- Buyer interviews. We talk to your commercial and technical leads about how customers find you, what they ask and what the buying process looks like.
- Search research. We map technical searches by stage: problem, method, comparison, supplier and specification.
- Site review. Technical health, plus where your expertise is buried in PDFs, posters, slide decks or a legacy project site.
- Content plan. Application pages, method explainers, comparison pages, technical notes, case studies and FAQs, ordered by buyer value.
- Specialist writing. Drafted from interviews and source documents, reviewed by your scientists.
- Authority building. Links from publications, partners, conference pages and University departments, through link building and digital PR.
- Lead measurement. Tracking enquiries, demo requests, sample requests and downloads back to the pages that produced them.
How long it takes
Research and planning take three to four weeks, largely because of interviews. Technical content takes longer to write and approve than consumer content, so most clients publish two to four substantial pages a month. B2B sales cycles are long, so we track leading signals such as rankings and enquiries along the way, and judge pipeline over six to twelve months.
If you have a trade show, product launch or funding announcement coming up, we plan content around it so the pages are live and indexed in time.
What drives the cost
- Technical depth and the time your specialists can give.
- Approval process. Regulated sectors and companies with investor or partner sign-off need more rounds.
- Number of products, applications and markets.
- Whether the site needs restructuring or a migration first. See website migrations.
Page types that work for science buyers
- Application pages. One page per use case, such as a technique for a particular cell type or a sensor for a particular environment, written for the scientist with that problem.
- Method explainers. How the technology works, with diagrams and honest comparisons against alternatives.
- Specification and compatibility pages. Clear, indexable data rather than a PDF.
- Comparison pages. Your approach against the main alternatives, fairly argued, because buyers search for these and will find a competitor's version if you do not write one.
- Team and publication pages. Named scientists, papers and patents build trust with expert readers and help search engines understand your expertise.
Common mistakes
The most common problem with science websites is that the expertise is invisible. The homepage talks about "innovative solutions", while the real substance, the method, the data and the applications, sits in a PDF or in the founders' heads.
- Writing only for investors. A site built for a funding round rarely answers buyers' questions.
- Vague language that avoids naming the method, the application or the competing technologies.
- Gated everything. Putting every useful document behind a form hides it from search engines and many buyers.
- Ignoring careers pages, which matter a great deal for recruiting in a competitive local market. See our post on science park careers pages.
- No author or team information, which weakens trust for expert content.
How we measure it
- Rankings and clicks for technical searches grouped by buyer stage.
- Enquiries, sample requests, demo bookings and quality of leads, by landing page.
- Mentions and links from relevant publications and institutions.
- Visibility in AI answers for key questions, through AI search visibility work.
Local knowledge
We know the Oxfordshire science landscape: the difference between a Littlemore science park address and a Harwell Campus one, why many firms near Didcot and Harwell recruit nationally, and how University connections can support a company's credibility online. That context helps us write for your buyers and your future staff.
Frequently asked questions
Our buyers are specialists. Do they really use Google?
Yes, though not always in the way consumers do. Scientists and engineers search for methods, specifications, standards, part numbers and comparisons, often long before they contact a supplier. Being the useful result for those searches puts you on the shortlist.
Search volume for our terms is tiny. Is SEO worth it?
Often more so. A term searched twenty times a month by laboratory managers can be worth more than a consumer term searched thousands of times. We judge searches by buyer value, not just volume.
Can you write about our technology accurately?
We research thoroughly, interview your specialists and send every technical claim back for review. Your team stays responsible for scientific accuracy; we make it findable and readable.
We cannot publish much because of IP and confidentiality. What then?
There is usually plenty that can be published: the problems you solve, how the method compares with alternatives, applications, specifications, team expertise and published papers. We agree boundaries before writing.
Do you work with companies selling internationally?
Yes. Many Oxford science firms sell mainly to the US, Europe and Asia. We plan for international search, including hreflang where you have regional sites.